lichess.org
Donate

Rating

@sheckley666 said in #8:
> Anyone realising, that the OP had been under 1400 for several years, before he managed to be over 1600 during one month? The only purposeful question is, what caused his performance explosion during this month.
And the easiest way to gain rating, is to play in tournaments and flagging people with a much higher rating... cause if u lose, u go 2-3 points down, but if u win, u gain 10-12 points - which u can clearly see on my games in that particular month, if u really wanna play detective;)
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-38
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-37
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-36
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-35
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-34
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-33
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-32
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-31
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-30
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-29
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-28
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-27
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-26
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-25
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-24
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-23
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-22
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-21
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-20
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-19
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-18
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-17
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-16
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-15
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-14
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-13
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-12
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-11
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-10
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-9
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-8
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-7
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-6
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-5
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-4
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-3
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-2
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating-1
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/rating
@Z3B4ZT14N said in #1:
> For 2 months ago I was like 1800 i Bullet, since then I has dropped quite a lot in rating, and I'm now 1450 ish... But it seems like the people with 1450 rating are just as good as the people with 1800 rating, how is that possible?

Bullet is just a stupid time control
The people in 1400 elo beat you because they play fast to try to make you lose on time, most of the time it works.(I can confirm this because I used to be 1400 in bullet)

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.