| Game analysis - Marshall gambit and Stockfish 10 evaluations#8 Now that's great! 19... h6! is a nice waiting move revealing that White is almost at zugzwang. White should have deviated earlier (17. Nd2?!). | okgo |
| Game analysis - Marshall gambit and Stockfish 10 evaluations#6 I was expecting an interesting position from the opening theory perspective (Marshall Gambit). This is cleary a -+ position. White can barely move. | okgo |
| General Chess Discussion - What's the point of 1.g3?#8 Besides all that was (well) said, 1. g3 has the point of getting the other player thinking on "what's the point of 1. g3". | okgo |
| Game analysis - Explain the last move#5 @Mollus is correct. | okgo |
| General Chess Discussion - Capablanca: R+B better than Q+B#6 https://snag.gy/XGsgmt.jpg | okgo |
| Game analysis - An alapin game, or, How to squander the initiative (tips for playing these positions?)#3 You exchanged 2 pawns for tempi so you had to keep Black's underdeveloped and/or make threats so that he'd be forced to make concessions (e.g. give back material, accept permanent weakenesses). 16. Bx… | okgo |
| Game analysis - why b5 is a bad move (sicilian najdorf)#13 @Sarg0n Great post! BTW consider changing your password, it seems your account was hacked some posts ago in this thread. | okgo |
| Game analysis - why b5 is a bad move (sicilian najdorf)#8 @Sarg0n No, winning the Queen is not an opening theme. And chess is far from being always concrete. Are you really a CM? | okgo |
| Game analysis - why b5 is a bad move (sicilian najdorf)#6 @RegisLakrids The thematic move I was talking about is, as I've written, b5. | okgo |
| Game analysis - why b5 is a bad move (sicilian najdorf)#2 Your 9... b7 loses material after 10. e5. b5 is a thematic move in the Sicilian. If played early, it's a little bit risky. You don't need to worry about it at your level, though. | okgo |
| Next |
|---|